How did you attract/address audience :
Black swan:
Certificate: 15
Why: Mild violence, mild language and senses a sexual nature
This allows me to understand what is appropiate and what is not when doing our film.
I feel this is certificated perfectly as anyone younger than 15 would possibly be disturbed and quite scared as it is a dark, daunting film. By seeing what is appropriate allowed us to refine our ideas for our own film.
Drag me to hell:
Cetificate: 15
Why: Mild violence, graphic images of gore, mild language.
This allows me to understand what is appropiate and what is not when doing our film.
This being in the horror genre helped us very much and we realized what makes a 15 horror film so successful. We established what worked for our film through this film and that we are on the right track in it being a 15.
127 Hours:
Certificate:15
Why:Little language, no violence, grapic/disturbing scenes.
This allows me to understand what is appropiate and what is not when doing our film.
Although this is not in the horror film section it was still a 15 an gave us more of an ides what we can include and that 15 films are very popular among society.
The shawshank Redemption:
Certificate: 15
Why: Strong language, scenes of a violent nature, Strong threat and menace are permitted unless sadistic or sexualised.
This allows me to understand what is appropiate and what is not when doing our film.
The scenes of violence and the inappropriate allowed to see what was perfect for a 15, although our film does not include any of these if we had chosen to we would follow this films examples.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind:
Certificate: 15
Why: Strong language, nudity within sexual context but without strong detail.
This allows me to understand what is appropiate and what is not when doing our film.
The confusing and intellectual concepts of this film allowed us to understand that we can have some complex and adventurous story line plots but we deiced against anything to complex as this is not common in the horror film conventions.
We first looked into which sub genre we found the most frightening and we discovered the element of the supernatural and ghosts were our calling. We then went into researching previous films I watched Dark water and Rebecca watched What lies beneath. We found the main element of these films is a young ghost child whom usually haunts a house in whic the used to live or something terrible happened to them and they want to haunt or kill the houses inhabitants. We decieded this would atract many people as we all live in a house or falt and this too could happen to us thats why we feel the fear we do. So we wanted to use this element of a young ghost girl haunting a house. Our audience will we feel like the fact we have changed the traditional ghost will expand our audience to a broader range of people. This will engage them into watching a traditional ghost film with a twist. We feel they are looking to see a big element of suspense and we provide that by not giving away the entire plot and ghost girl straight away. They will enjoy that it could be seen as realistic and they will feel it could happen to them as its in a house and they will be of a similar age to them self's so they will want to feel it could be them next. This is how we targeted a specific age of 15-18 year olds because they as I stated before can related to the characters age and how closely suited there environment is to there own.
The location is perfect as it is in a modern home and the use of props are barbie dolls and a light. The house will engage the audience as we all live in a house or flat and can imagine it being them there in the bed. The props are globally known products and some people see dolls as scary and haunting and the traditional use of a light flicker on and off entices the audience because they wanna see what is lurking in the shadows.
We felt our casting was perfect and challenges the original idea of a main protagonist being a female. By having a male who looks in his early 20's allows teenager and above relate ad it opens up a new view to the audience of a males perspective of being haunted. The threat is kept traditional by having a young ghost girl of the age of 10, we felt this will keep our audience comfortable with this as it hasn't changed the entire generic conventions completely. I feel both these attributes will engage the audience as it is traditional but a new idea too and they will want to see how this works and they can relate.
My title sequence engages the audience because it is a slight sense of foreshadowing to what our film contains and it sets the mood and scene as we want them to feel uncomfortable and have a sense of fear through the suspense. The images
When looking on IMDB we found the films the this sub genre are always a 15 due to there content. Mild violence, no-little gore and mild language. Also we looked into the ghost's usual apperance and found they are often very pale, with dark matted hair, black eyes with bleeding lips. We aspire to something similar and hope our look can be noticed as a ghost genre. Also we will attract a younger audience because with the other key element usually being a 20-30 year old being haunted we have used a male actor whom looks much older and can act older too. This allows the audience to feel some what connected to them but doesnt haved the element of living on there own. This adds to the audiences expierence of suspense and the element of the unknown. However by using a male this once again as stated before breaks the stereotype mould and this will attract new audience of perhaps more males as they want to se how a male will react to this and also will be a new exciting idea as no one has been this happen before.
Our lighting will be dim and this was seen in the film Dark water. The reason for this is that it is human nature to fear what is lurking in the shadows and we are desperate to find if there is any danger, in our film we only use a single weak light which will provide a dim, low key light and this creates an idea we are almost blind but cannot see the danger before us. Music will be quite simple and slow perfeebly on the piano as this offers a low key and is quite daunting. The setting is a singular room and this is very similar to Dark water as the threat appears in the bedroom and this is identical to our film. In our bedrooms we feel safe and this will make the audience feel uneasy and perhaos no longer safe in there place of peace. We felt this was a very good idea as our audience will most likely be afraid after seeing this and want to move rooms!. We include dolls in which are sometimes a generic convetion as dolls are seen to be myterious and can look very realistic. As there expression never changes we feel like we are being watched and this adds to our films illusion.
Overall we attract our audience by following the typical generic conventions of a ghost sub genre but we do break a few sterotypes along the way making it unique and original.
Our titles worked very well as we used building blocks as this is child like as we wanted people to feel it could happen to them and that we feel it builds suspense.
This is from our titles and as I stated beforehand this is the building blocks and I felt the use of colour really stands out and adds to our film. We liked the lighting as it was dim enough to suggest we were hiding something or keeping something a secret and this added fear.
Our music really does add to our final film as we used garage band to create simple sounds which add a whole new feeling to the film. I felt without the music we don't see the suspense building up for our audience. I music was quite chilling as it almost sounded like a whisper or the wind talking to them and trying to tell you off the dangers before you. This therefore engages our audience as the music gives them a hint for what's in store but they do not know what this is.
Our feedback from our final film was over all good because they audience realized it was from a ghost sub genre. they thought the music could have had more of a range of sound but they commented that our lighting, location and cast were perfect and added to the films success. I feel our response to this feed back was good and although if thee was a bad comment you felt quite disappointed it was constructive criticism and we knew what if we did do it again we would know what to do.
Here is my wordle of what our feedback concluded too, this allowed us to undertand what was good and was bad. We wrote down what we needed to improve and therefore tried to do this in our final film.